同事被诈骗的坑了，目前已找到网页地址， ping 到了 ip，有没有大佬去搞他一下，没啥思路

支付宝交易那边直接投诉支付宝, 申请退款, 联系支付宝也比找 V 友强

别搞了，先让你同事下个反诈 app 吧

笑死了，已经去警察局录完笔录回来了

顶多去转转那告知有个盗版

这位同事是你自己吧？

找这个收款的代理商，也有可能就是这个站长 jieqiy.com
也有可能是这个 dkewl.com

最新消息，去警察局做完笔录就叫他回来等消息了，也在支付宝申诉了，但是估计也是凉🤣🤣🤣🤣
另外真的不是我，我发出来就纯感兴趣想搞这个网站一下😅

可以举报一波： https://12321.cn/

公安立案标准不是 2000 吗？这 1999 能立上吗？

怎么想的用这个小网页买这个

这哥付了 4500 ，能立案，能不能追回就不一定了

CVE-2018-15919 Remotely observable behaviour in auth-gss2.c in OpenSSH through 7.8 could be used by remote attackers to detect existence of users on a target system when GSS2 is in use. NOTE: the discoverer states 'We understand that the OpenSSH developers do not want to treat such a username enumeration (or "oracle") as a vulnerability.'
CVE-2017-15906 The process_open function in sftp-server.c in OpenSSH before 7.6 does not properly prevent write operations in readonly mode, which allows attackers to create zero-length files.
CVE-2021-36368 ** DISPUTED ** An issue was discovered in OpenSSH before 8.9. If a client is using public-key authentication with agent forwarding but without -oLogLevel=verbose, and an attacker has silently modified the server to support the None authentication option, then the user cannot determine whether FIDO authentication is going to confirm that the user wishes to connect to that server, or that the user wishes to allow that server to connect to a different server on the user's behalf. NOTE: the vendor's position is "this is not an authentication bypass, since nothing is being bypassed."
CVE-2018-20685 In OpenSSH 7.9, scp.c in the scp client allows remote SSH servers to bypass intended access restrictions via the filename of . or an empty filename. The impact is modifying the permissions of the target directory on the client side.
CVE-2018-15473 OpenSSH through 7.7 is prone to a user enumeration vulnerability due to not delaying bailout for an invalid authenticating user until after the packet containing the request has been fully parsed, related to auth2-gss.c, auth2-hostbased.c, and auth2-pubkey.c.
CVE-2020-14145 The client side in OpenSSH 5.7 through 8.4 has an Observable Discrepancy leading to an information leak in the algorithm negotiation. This allows man-in-the-middle attackers to target initial connection attempts (where no host key for the server has been cached by the client). NOTE: some reports state that 8.5 and 8.6 are also affected.
CVE-2020-15778 ** DISPUTED ** scp in OpenSSH through 8.3p1 allows command injection in the scp.c toremote function, as demonstrated by backtick characters in the destination argument. NOTE: the vendor reportedly has stated that they intentionally omit validation of "anomalous argument transfers" because that could "stand a great chance of breaking existing workflows."
CVE-2021-41617 sshd in OpenSSH 6.2 through 8.x before 8.8, when certain non-default configurations are used, allows privilege escalation because supplemental groups are not initialized as expected. Helper programs for AuthorizedKeysCommand and AuthorizedPrincipalsCommand may run with privileges associated with group memberships of the sshd process, if the configuration specifies running the command as a different user.
CVE-2023-38408 The PKCS#11 feature in ssh-agent in OpenSSH before 9.3p2 has an insufficiently trustworthy search path, leading to remote code execution if an agent is forwarded to an attacker-controlled system. (Code in /usr/lib is not necessarily safe for loading into ssh-agent.) NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2016-10009.
CVE-2016-20012 ** DISPUTED ** OpenSSH through 8.7 allows remote attackers, who have a suspicion that a certain combination of username and public key is known to an SSH server, to test whether this suspicion is correct. This occurs because a challenge is sent only when that combination could be valid for a login session. NOTE: the vendor does not recognize user enumeration as a vulnerability for this product.
CVE-2019-6111 An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to the scp implementation being derived from 1983 rcp, the server chooses which files/directories are sent to the client. However, the scp client only performs cursory validation of the object name returned (only directory traversal attacks are prevented). A malicious scp server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can overwrite arbitrary files in the scp client target directory. If recursive operation (-r) is performed, the server can manipulate subdirectories as well (for example, to overwrite the .ssh/authorized_keys file).
CVE-2019-6110 In OpenSSH 7.9, due to accepting and displaying arbitrary stderr output from the server, a malicious server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can manipulate the client output, for example to use ANSI control codes to hide additional files being transferred.
CVE-2019-6109 An issue was discovered in OpenSSH 7.9. Due to missing character encoding in the progress display, a malicious server (or Man-in-The-Middle attacker) can employ crafted object names to manipulate the client output, e.g., by using ANSI control codes to hide additional files being transferred. This affects refresh_progress_meter() in progressmeter.c.

一扫一堆漏洞

请求地址看到 http://c2c.jieqiy.com/# 这个网站，支付代理吗🤨

不值得，这智商劝赶紧下个反诈 APP 。

这只是个跳转地址啊

这 UI 倒是挺还原的，不会是直接扒的源码吧

这种智商建议下载反诈 APP 保护一下。去报警只会沦为 JC 私下笑谈。说不定哪天宣传发炸这就是典型得例子了。

每个平台都会强调不要平台外交易，这亏只能硬吃了，诈骗基本追不回来。

所以就是贪小便宜是吧，那我一点不会同情，该

感少淘短链制作工具 http://xdaacc89899.neqwetaobaopamp6.top/

是不是在咸鱼买，然后让你去转转交易，给你的链接就是个钓鱼网站。我遇到的域名还是 zhuanzhuan 啥的，不仔细看还真没看出来异常，最后送了他一波 ddos 套餐~

我之前也被骗过 100 气死了.

是让刷单做任务, 前期会给一些甜头, 赚了 100 的时候, 让投 50, 想着不亏就投了, 结果也是真返回来了.
第二次让投 100, 结果不给返了, 让继续投, 不投就不给返, 麻蛋, 生气.

@sirz 笑死，小红书，纯情女研究生上岸出自动 ipad pro 2022 款，4500 出，走转转，最后给了个二维码，扫完跳到上面贴的链接，这哥一点都没怀疑就付款，然后被拉黑

@tengyuanOasis
@dif 已经录进公司下期开会素材了，关键前两周老板还自掏腰包请大家看孤注一掷，转眼这大哥就被骗了🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@tengyuanOasis 笑死了 原来是这样的

@tengyuanOasis 6

网页里面内容好像都是写死的

都 23 年了 还搁这儿疫情呢?

付款页面用的腾讯云的服务器。
下了一单，没付款，等收货。

zhuanzhuan.com 这个不是转转官网？

@tengyuanOasis 小红书好像是这样的，我在小红书卖耳机发不了闲鱼链接，只能给二维码，但是不跳到 app 敢直接网页支付属实是不应该

Yanji.php 所以是东北 延吉的？

@Andim #32 那是 验机 的拼音

@bianhui @tyrantZhao @dif 下载了好被老大哥 7x24 不间断监听吗？

那天朋友发了一个类似的网址给我，我好奇，就点开了一下，过了几分钟，96110 就打电话来告诉我注意诈骗

@HackerTerry 自己就算了 父母还是得安排一个， 他们的效率是真的强， 前脚刚打后脚马上来温馨提醒。

@HackerTerry 智商不够就下一个吧，真的，起码 ccp 不会明着骗你钱。

跳转过去就是转转的官网啊，这一般人都看不出来...（为啥跳到转转官网了还会被骗??）

反诈 app 还是有存在价值的

@dif 什么智障言论，虽然报警没有任何卵用。
是不是被人强奸了，也会被人嘲笑？

暗网 3000 刀能解决它的网站

@HackerTerry
主要是有的人确实识破不了诈骗，确实容易上当，反诈 app 至少能让这部分人少亏钱

@xiaoranj #12 请教老哥这是怎么扫出来的？有什么工具可以学习一下吗？

@yaocai321 私以为你这才是智障言论。强奸和被骗是两码事。一个是无法反抗，一个是智商不达标。

@HackerTerry 和金钱被骗走相比，被老大哥监听可以说是毛毛雨了。再说了，监听的手段很多，不差这一个。

现在提示商品已下架

这种都是源码搭建出来的，我同学就给人维护这玩意，把自己维护进去了。

@dif #44 智商羞辱

使用的宝塔面板

http://111.92.243.17:8888

发不了图片，http://xdaacc89899.neqwetaobaopamp6.top/tuku//2.php 这种冒充闲鱼转转的最近变多了，不过写的很水，到处都是洞。

@InkAndBanner 啊对对对

{
code: -1,
msg: "订单已支付或者已过期",
data: null
}

@Friday2333 php 后台调的转转数据，页面是照着写出来的，假转转

金边？估计哪个被困的程序员写的吧。这 5600 帮他减少点痛苦吧

数据库里没登录 ip ，只能插个探针看看了。

@ShuWei 那不是 咱看啥网站都被监测了哈哈哈哈哈哈哈

@missya 咋看出来是宝塔的

@jier17cm 难道你以为不是？

@tengyuanOasis #7 被搞了多少钱？

@tengyuanOasis #53 36.138.127.161 - - 30/Aug/2023:20:41:39 它的登录 ip 。

知道在金边哪里么，可以打这边反诈热线举报，不过如果在园区里这么点钱估计不会管

@tengyuanOasis #7 我四年前也是做笔录了然无任何用处